The Comparative Guide To Raising Capital: Regulation A+ Vs. Regulation D

The Comparative Guide to Raising Capital: Regulation A+ vs. Regulation D

Raising capital is a pivotal step for businesses in real estate syndication, real estate funds, investment funds, small businesses, and startups. Understanding the nuances of the regulatory environment is crucial for an effective fundraising strategy. In this blog, we delve into the details of Regulation A+ and Regulation D, two primary pathways for capital raising in the United States, and how businesses can navigate these regulations effectively.

Introduction To Capital Raising Regulations

Before diving into the specifics of Regulation A+ and Regulation D, it’s important to understand the context in which these regulations operate. Both are mechanisms under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that allow companies to raise capital while complying with federal securities laws.

Regulation A+ (Reg A+)

Regulation A+ is often termed the “mini-IPO” process. It allows companies to raise up to $75 million within a 12-month period from both accredited and non-accredited investors. This regulation was designed to make access to capital markets more accessible for smaller companies.

Pros of Reg A+:

– Access to a broader investor base, including non-accredited investors.

– Ability to publicly advertise the offering.

– Opportunity to raise significant capital (up to $75 million).

Cons of Reg A+:

– Extensive disclosure and reporting requirements.

– Preemptive state securities laws review.

– Potentially high costs associated with the offering process.

– Requires SEC review.

– Can take a considerable amount of time to launch.

Regulation D (Reg D)

Regulation D, on the other hand, provides a framework for raising capital through private placements. The most commonly used rules under Reg D are Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c), which allow for unlimited capital raising from accredited investors (and up to 35 non-accredited investors under 506(b)).

Pros of Reg D:

– Less rigorous disclosure and reporting requirements compared to Reg A+.

– Faster and more cost-effective capital raising process.

– Preemption of state securities laws, meaning less regulatory oversight from state authorities.

Cons of Reg D:

– Generally limited to accredited investors (except under certain conditions in Rule 506(b)).

– Prohibition on general solicitation if using Rule 506(b) to sell to non-accredited investors.

Choosing The Right Regulation For Your Business

The choice between Regulation A+ and Regulation D depends on several factors, including the size of the capital raise, the company’s stage of development, and the target investor base.

For Real Estate Syndications And Funds

Real Estate Syndications and Funds often prefer Regulation D for its cost-effectiveness and streamlined process. It is particularly suitable for companies seeking to raise capital quickly from a network of accredited investors.

For Startups And Small Businesses

Startups and small businesses might opt for Regulation A+ if they aim to reach a wider audience of investors, including those who are non-accredited. The public nature of Reg A+ offerings can also enhance the visibility and credibility of the investment opportunity.


Understanding the differences between Regulation A+ and Regulation D is essential for companies looking to raise capital efficiently and effectively. Each regulation offers distinct advantages and challenges, making it crucial for businesses to carefully consider their options.

Legal Disclaimer

The information provided in this blog is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice.

Any specific legal issues, concerns, or situations requiring legal advice should be discussed with a qualified licensed attorney. The use or reliance on any information contained in this blog is solely at your own risk. The information provided in this blog does not constitute legal advice or establish an attorney-client relationship of any kind between the reader and PPM LAWYERS or the author. External links provided in this blog are not under the control of PPM LAWYERS, and we are not responsible for the content of any linked site or any link contained in a linked site.

What Customers Say About Us

Featured Clients

Trusted Partners